On 5 January 2013 20:16, Sean Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 January 2013 19:28, kpb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Sean and all >> >> While Markdown/textile are pretty light, my personal site isn't pretty :-) >> >> http://sohcahtoa.org.uk/ >> >> (The Llamas are a family joke). The method currently in use is described >> here >> >> http://sohcahtoa.org.uk/pages/publish-a-web-site-with-bash-scripts.html > > > I don't see any WYSIWYG editor in action here at all, yet you said that > you used one to produce your "templates". > > Can you link to a template-based site that you've built using a WYSIWYG > editor? >
I'm just interested to see what the code generated by the WYSIWYGs you're advocating looks like, not pages generated by your shell script thing which is not what the original thread was about. I stick with my argument that it is better to learn (X)HTML if one is trying to write markup than some third-party "WYSIWYG" where what you see will only be what you get on one browser (if you're lucky). Sean
-- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
