On 3 September 2013 15:38, Jon Spriggs <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 September 2013 14:51, Liam Proven <[email protected]> wrote: >> Doesn't everyone with 0.5 of a clue know this? > > Frankly, No. As soon as (if not before) the "NSA whistleblower is in > Hong Kong" headlines dropped off the BBC front page, outside of those > of us who actually care about this stuff stopped being interested, and > went back to "sharing cat photos with my family". My wife doesn't > care, and frankly is bored witless of me waffling on about it. > > <SNIP> > >> Scott McNeally said it in about 1996: >> >> "You *have* no privacy on the Internet. Get over it." > > It doesn't have to be like this. In code we can solve this, the > problem is getting a usable interface, a compelling reason and a good > marketing team to solve the last 5%. Mailpile might be able to do it, > bitmessage could also, but all the time it's just the Tin Foil Hat > Wearers Brigade (mine just covers the tips of my ears) and the > Free-as-in-Freedom crowd banging on about it, the rest of the world > won't give a flying .... Ooo, You're a kitty! (http://xkcd.com/231/)
Exactly. Your wife doesn't know and as you yourself said *doesn't care*. The thing to do is not try to build more little isolated secure bits of the Internet. There is absolutely no use or point to a secure email service because as soon as you use it to email anyone else it /ceases/ to be secure. In other words, the selling point of the tool immediately stops applying the instant that you use it. Summary: chocolate teapot. Completely and utterly useless. So the smart thing to do is to get the message out there and make sure that people know that the Internet is public, what they are doing can be observed and tracked, and if you don't want people to know or see what you're doing online then don't do it online in the first place. That is the /only/ real solution. If you like, sure, start a secure email service in some jurisdiction that permits you - i.e. not N America, the EU or much of the world - and make it dead easy to send and receive full round-trip encrypted email. But if the other end isn't using it too, it's useless. It'll cost a lot to do it, and since email is now as free as air, you won't make a penny from it unless you come up with a remarkable, fascinating new spin on the Freemium model. Meantime, next best thing, given we're on an Ubuntu forum? Make it super stupid easy to do PGP email in Thunderbird. I've done it before, for an employer who insisted on it. I'm a skilled techie with over 2 decades' experience. It took me days of research and hours of work. It was horrid, a nightmare. That's the problem to fix. Not introducing new secure email protocols, which won't do a damned bit of good. Because http://xkcd.com/927/ You cannot "fix" the insecurity of email for unskilled users with new tools. All the tools *already exist,* they're just too hard to use. http://xkcd.com/1200/ http://xkcd.com/538/ http://xkcd.com/1181/ -- Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: [email protected] • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: [email protected] • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 -- [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
