Joe Smith wrote: > I think that overall, having a presence on social networking sites > would be beneficial and help promote/inform. It is not right to jump > the gun and set these up before a confirmed consensus has been reached > by the group as a whole, but what's done is done.
Um. What? If someone wants to setup a resource they are free to do so. They don't need approval/consensus. It's called getting things done. I'm glad there is a facebook group. I joined it straight away. > One of the biggest > issues, and one which I think is unrelated, is that of us not > maintaining our wiki (I'm pretty guilty, I haven't done my one-a-week > for a while...). > Well then perhaps other methods were needed which might be more apt to update. > As far as maintainability, I think that at the very least, the > Facebook group can be used as a semi-static page with links to our > 'official' web locations. I know that I have done a few searches for > groups over the years for linux and other topics I'm interested in, > and using this as another way to drive traffic might be helpful. If I > got a twitter reminder about the meeting once every two weeks, that'd > be good to get me there too :/ > > I've set up a few facebook groups, and am pretty active on Twitter, so > at the very least Grant has one backup, but it sounds like it won't be > an issue. Anyways, I want to hear more from Nathan and Neal before I > give a +1, but I do think it's a good plan, and thanks Grant for > getting this going :) > I think it's just fine. I don't think any further approval is needed. When did this become a bureaucracy? -- Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
