On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:34:09PM -0700, Nathan Haines wrote: > I agree with Neal that the LoCo page is a tool for the LoCo to focus our > efforts. I've said it before: there needs to be a far better answer to > finding LUGs than currently exists, and I really wish the energy that is > being focused at misusing one of the LoCo's pages would be directed > towards creating a solution to the problem of how to find a local LUG or > contributing to the existing resources that Grant claims exists (in > opposition to my claim that I've yet to see a current maintained list). > I would support a link to such a resource from our wiki pages in a > flash--although probably not across each and every single page. I > jumped at the chance to be a distribution point for Bay Area LUG fliers > at OSCON.
Is the giant LUG list over at Linux Online (linux.org) not sufficient? (One nice thing about it, is that it seems to automatically ping groups every year, to make sure information is kept up-to-date. Though, of course, I'm not sure how may LUGs _do_ keep their stuff up-to-date there.) e.g.: http://www.linux.org/groups/usa/california.html (In fact, LUGOD's own info is a little out of date, since we only hold meetings once a month, but also now hold social gatherings once a month, too.) -- -bill! Sent from my computer -- Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
