Hello California Team, we stand at a crossroads, with paths in front of us. I pick the path with less drama and hassles. Whatever the group decides to do I suggest we not question each other's * motivations*. This is a volunteer group. We are not getting paid to this. Let's assume everyone here is involved to share in the Spirit of Ubuntu. We may differ on what that means.
Just to be clear- I don't doubt *anyone's* motivation in this group. To me it is clear that there is noble intent all the way 'round. *It's not just me that thinks things could be improved here. *Sure, we could go details and sort out every little detail that started what is currently taking away valuable time from this group. We could read logs until we can read no more. I would prefer an *open and transparent process* that outlines how we deal with problems as they arise. I have been waiting since last year for this. Neal said he would do so; California team organization, management structure, processes Roadmap 1. Jono wrote a blog entry<http://www.jonobacon.org/2009/11/10/creating-a-roadmap-for-more-successful-teams/>on roadmaps 2. Neal says one is "in the works" since Mark suggested it a few weeks ago Source: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Meetings/09December13 Waiting, MarkDude PS Whatever people think about this lets not ascribe negative labels to people. If it appears that I have done that, I am sorry and that was wrong. I do have a right to ask for follow-up on something from last year. I can't do much more than make noise until then.
-- Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
