Here's the proposed criteria. I think Rick's on this list; feel free to post feedback here, and at least one of us will make sure it gets accounted for.
----- Forwarded message from Rick Spencer <[email protected]> ----- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:56 -0700 From: Rick Spencer <[email protected]> To: Martin Pitt <[email protected]>, Alexander Sack <[email protected]>, Alberto Milone <[email protected]>, Sebastien Bacher <[email protected]>, Bryce Harrington <[email protected]>, Marjo Mercado <[email protected]>, Araceli Pulido <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Mesa 7.6 go/no go criteria > 6. rickspencer3 and all: define measure for triggering roll back We should roll back if we encounter: 1. We get new crashers with dupes on any hardware that we can't diagnose 2. We get crashers that can only be fixed by updating other components (i.e. -intel) 3. We get crashers that require any kind of kernel patches, etc... 4. Similar to 1-3, but for freezes and performance regressions as well I suppose the "we get" piece could use some tightening up. Thoughts? Cheers, Rick ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Ubuntu-x mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-x
