Christopher wrote: > Grass, accessed through Q-GIS and gdal are powerful, but not > good for PCA which I often need.
Hi, out of an effort to make things better, can I ask where GRASS's PCA tools were deficient? We gave them a good overhaul last year, including successful cross-validation vs. R's offerings. Aside from a minor metadata limitation when PCA'ing dozens of images at the same time I'm not aware of any problems -- and so would be most interested to hear of anything lacking, so that it may be fixed for all. thanks, Hamish _______________________________________________ UbuntuGIS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
