Well you're using the Unstable repository, things like that will happen as you are getting the latest versions. For Quantal(12.10) I'm currently updating it, it should be all fine at the end of the day or tomorrow.

On precise (12.04) everything is up and should be working.

Jérôme

On 13-07-09 12:26 PM, Daniel Kastl wrote:
Hi,

This change is very confusing and it would be nice if it would be announced beforehand and somewhere documented. Right now it just breaks a lot of things. I think many people used "ubuntugis-unstable" PPA because the "stable" PPA was not really offering recent package versions in the past such as PostGIS 2.0.

I'm speaking from the pgRouting perspective and I have difficulties now to build packages for different Ubuntu releases. Actually I just tried to see what happens when I update to libgdal1h using Ubuntu 12.10:

  * First the upgrade removed QGIS and Mapserver (little surprise) and
    a bunch of other packages
  * Then I was looking for postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.0 ... but another
    surprise. There was no new package for Precise

Is the Precise package just missing and will be added soon? Or will be packages for 12.10 not updated anymore? Then I'm wondering why libgdal1h was published for 12.10 but other software was not updated.

Daniel














On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Hamish <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Pedro:
    > After an update of GDAL to v1.10 through ubuntugis-unstable, I
    have a
    > lot of problems with package dependencies from libgdal1. This
    package
    > was, apparently, replaced by libgdal1h (gdal 1.10.x) but there are
    > many programs that are not understanding it as a substitute (eg OTB,
    > pgrouting which depends on the package postgresql-9.1-postgis,
    etc..).
    >
    > Is there any reason for libgdal1 have been changed to libgdal1h,
    since
    > there are many packages that use libgdal1 as dependency?

    Hi,

    re. the new libgdal1h package, see:
    http://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/06/msg00015.html
    http://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/06/msg00016.html


    if you use /any/ after-market package repository (such as
    UbuntuGIS's),
    you can expect things not to work from time to time as packaging
    changes filter through the system. if you want things not to change
    unexpectedly then use the official distro packages. aka be patient,
    you're witnessing progress as it happens, and the other packages in
    "unstable"(!) will catch up to the new naming soon enough. :)


    regards,
    Hamish

    _______________________________________________
    UbuntuGIS mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
    http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki




--
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>


_______________________________________________
UbuntuGIS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

_______________________________________________
UbuntuGIS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

Reply via email to