At version 1.10 with libgdal1h I mean.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Johan Van de Wauw <johan.vandew...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight). > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal > > Johan > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik <ivan.min...@gmail.com> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11/22/2013 06:23 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:16:50AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:01:39AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 17:16:03 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Francesco Paolo >>>>>> Lovergine wrote: >>>>>>> BTW, without annoying all of you with a so looooooong >>>>>>> history about this issue, I'm going to introduce a new >>>>>>> libgdal1h binary package (h means hidden, better >>>>>>> suggestions are welcome :)), with a new SONAME libgdal.1h >>>>>>> to manage a decent migration to the new flavor. This will >>>>>>> sacrifice third-parties sw compatibility, but well, who >>>>>>> cares? It would be break anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe a better choice in this specific case would be >>>>>> introducing a new binary package (libgdal1h) that >>>>>> Conflicts/Breaks against libgdal1 and provides the usual >>>>>> library with the usual name/soname. Of course, that will >>>>>> force a lot of bNMUs and an explicit unblocking set to >>>>>> complete the transition properly. Make sense? >>>>> I must admit from your mails I don't really understand what >>>>> your plan is. Do the packages currently in experimental follow >>>>> that plan? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, at least the still pending in NEW queue (it has a proper >>>> fix). I would simply provide a new libtary package that provides >>>> the usual library name/soname and conflicts with the old one. >>>> That will require a good amount of bNMUs for rdepends. >>>> >>> >>> After a couple of new releases in experimental, it is now time of >>> pushing this change ASAP in sid. RMs, could you please give an ack >>> about that? As said, we will need to ask for a long list of bNMUs >>> after release in sid. >>> >> >> Dear Francesco and Bas, I was trying to read all possible information >> (bug reports, debian/changelog, mailing list) about the libgdal1h >> issue and transition, but still, it is not clear for me what the >> current state is and what it needs to be done to complete this task. >> >> Please, could you summarize current situation ? Is it possible that >> GDAL 10 packaging will be fully completed soon enough to get to Ubuntu >> 14.04 LTS in best shape ? >> >> Thanks a lot for your work. >> >> - -- >> Ivan Mincik >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSwtTfAAoJEPfdLsR5UpoewwkH/21PGRkViUY5WcbEANL5J9Ln >> KP8GXUQU45TDeM+Wlq4VI5XHxDP82Ge+acMl85tjv7Psx2NStWTNHdMhcRGm7r2F >> T8PO7eV8x6Y7jd3i199FwvzwS6nUtTiu+M/FtS4ekvQxiEP9rNwEdf3XRTfGoDtZ >> RWjEAIodQeN1ddZE2hFpi2TPxVD9xPik+lDjXh7jDCfrq+8Wslg5PzXJynGHRZKG >> GLtkvK8o93P2VPrDmp94qa9KclQJ4s5mrjhXH+2FzVfCaJMwVmdSFCUrFLk5wWBs >> Ebkb3mNANrM7Du3EGdigIchETD7zBQN1jwXsw4++0K1VgwY6ih/k/83maVHwPUU= >> =Vqtn >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org >> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52c2d4df.5000...@gmail.com >> _______________________________________________ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
