Yes true ? I would prefer have a ubuntu classic as choice more than unity. Unity is ubuntu : I think is life cycle will be very short no use to learn how to use it ! I tried to install many times ugr but each time I had to come back to ubuntu classic. I think it's the same as with kde4, at beginning, it was not very stable, but now it's good thing (though i prefer gnome : quicker and themes are really good) it's a matter of test I use both. At the moment ubuntu classic with gnome 2.32 works very fine I could even get back emerald so i am very happy with it. I would like to test gnome-3 more but I think it's too unstable on ubuntu at the moment. Normal they did it on purpose
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 03:08 +0000, Chris Gummin a écrit : > Public bug reported: > > The idea of UGR was to have Ubuntu with Gnome 3 INSTEAD OF Unity. Why > are we adding a session option for Unity? > > ** Affects: ugr-session-unity > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > GNOME Remix: Testing Team, which is subscribed to UGR (Ubuntu Gnome > Remix) Project. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776867 > > Title: > Unity option defeats UGR's purpose > > Status in UGR unity session option: > New > > Bug description: > The idea of UGR was to have Ubuntu with Gnome 3 INSTEAD OF Unity. Why > are we adding a session option for Unity? > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Team UGR, which is subscribed to ugr-session-unity. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776867 Title: Unity option defeats UGR's purpose Status in UGR unity session option: Opinion Bug description: The idea of UGR was to have Ubuntu with Gnome 3 INSTEAD OF Unity. Why are we adding a session option for Unity? -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnometeam Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnometeam More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
