On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:23 +0100, Matthew C. Bassett wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:22 +0100, Matthew Bassett wrote: > > On 27 April 2010 11:58, Nicola Larosa <nicola.lar...@canonical.com> wrote: > > [some stuff I deleted] > > > We'll do something simpler. :-) > > > We updated the contacts definition on > > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/desktopcouch/contact , by > > > adding an "extended_address" field; then we'll update the code so that we > > > have two matching fields in Evolution, the web interface, and the phones. > > > > Simpler AND better :) > > > > Many thanks for answering my question; I'll stop worrying about it > > (I'm guessing from what you've described that when you roll out the > > new code that it should all automagically become consistent, > > regardless of where the most correct copy of the data lies). > > Ooh! New code! > > Some time over the weekend (possibly related to an upgrade to > evolution-couchdb?) Evolution suddenly started showing addresses stored > on U1 completely. > do you have our beta PPA in your /etc/apt/sources.list? Because we deployed a fixed package there, so that might be
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuone-users Post to : ubuntuone-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuone-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
