Possible I suppose.  I would be more inclined to believe 3 rather than
2 however.  Although we certainly paused to check on a few rules we
didn't delay all that much.  My guess is if the three of us played
another 3 player game it would clock in at around 4.  Getting it down
to the 2-3 hour mark is going to require the same players, having
played it several times, and NONE of them being AP.

To be honest I am not considering the length to be a detractor.  The
time flew by very fast and we were all quite surprised to look up at
the clock when we were finished and note that it was 11:30 (we started
about 5:30).  Which says something for the game.

I plan on sitting down again with the rules tonight to make sure I
didn't miss anything.

On Feb 1, 3:14 pm, Casey Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've heard people say once they have the rules down playtime has lowered to
> 2-3 hours.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Sylvus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My comments regarding Runewars are simple.
>
> > It is the best big box fantasy flight game they have put out.
> > Although I do have to clarify that this does NOT include Descent AFTER
> > it was altered by Road to Legend.
>
> > We played a three player game that ended up taking us SIX (yes six)
> > hours including rules explanation etc.  This IS NOT a game I would
> > probably enjoy playing with someone prone do AP since you can see how
> > long it took us and none of the three of us are prone to it.  Yes,
> > there may be a turn we have to stop and think for a bit but it is
> > usually the exception rather than the rule.
>
> > It was well balanced I thought and the decisions were tough to make.
> > I certainly will play things differently the next time around.  Map
> > creation is more important than I had anticipated and I found myself
> > hurting a bit as the resources I needed as a human were not once that
> > were close to my starting area.  Having 8 food was nice, but most of
> > my quality units were NOT produced through food.  That would leave me
> > hurting a bit (although I certainly still held my own).
>
> > Excellent game.
>
> > On Jan 29, 10:59 pm, "M. Crane" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I'd like to hear what Sylvus thinks of Runewars...
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "utah county boardgamers association" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<ucboardgamers%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/ucboardgamers?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "utah 
county boardgamers association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ucboardgamers?hl=en.

Reply via email to