Will Newton wrote: > > I was after a rationale or a justification for this decision which I > haven't managed to find as yet.
Since I didn't make the decision I cannot say definitively, but it sounds like it was done to silence compiler warning messages. > If it would be accepted I would be > happy to submit a patch that fixes the warnings and restores char > behaviour to architecture dependant. I am not a maintainer, but think it is an excellent idea. Presumably you would test with both signed and unsigned char platform builds. David Daney _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
