On Monday 16 April 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:14:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 16 April 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > - It calls sleep expecting a cancellation point at nanosleep. But > > > libc.so's sleep.c has "libc_hidden_proto(nanosleep)" which means it > > > always calls the libc.so version, never the wrapped version in > > > libpthread.so that's a cancellation point. Delete that line from > > > sleep.c and usleep.c and now sleep/usleep start acting like > > > cancellation points. > > > > i need to finish up my local cancellation handler rewrite and get it > > merged ... > > Or just move on to NPTL, tbh...
i certainly want to see that happen for most people, but i'm not sure we've verified yet that it's feasible for no-mmu -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
