On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:54:35PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote: >On Tuesday 17 April 2007 9:33 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> after much pushing and proding and looks of disappointments of missed >> deadlines, 0.9.29-rc1 is up > >Well, technically 0.9.29_rc1 is up. Still: Yay! > >> idea is to get the main things squashed and tag final end of this week at >> which point we'll branch >> >> then we'll look at the 0.9.29.z series as we get nptl merged into trunk >> -mike > >Ok, you tagged 18471 as 0.9.29-rc1. Since then, some small tweaks have been >made: > >vapier moved the web pages out of svn (presumably into its own repository). >vapier reverted the -fsigned-char thing discussed on the list. >vapier did a nommu fix to ldso. >vapier did some whitespace fixes. >vapier did a bugfix to ldconfig. > >All good. > >What concerns me is the enormous gratuitous change (svn 18480) aldot made that >added a new config option that has _nothing_ to do with the checkin comment, >made huge changes to four different files, and is justified as code >shrinkage, not a fix. Is that the kind of thing that should go in during a >feature freeze? (I'm not saying it's a bad patch, I'm saying it seems like a
I explicitely asked vapier if it was ok to checkin at this point in time. These hunks were lying around locally and i just forgot to apply them when vapier ACKed them back then. Since he reACKed them just before i applied them (you were even online at that time, so you should have seen us talking), i don't see the problem? >bad time to check in a largeish change for something learly optional which >isn't something I can glance at and feel comfortable I understand what it >does.) _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
