Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I don't think revisiting the unfortunate circumstances is going to get > us anywhere. Is there some way we can move on, and end up with a > unified port? I don't care how we end up with an up-to-date branch as > long as we do; from my experience with long-running branch development > I tend to think that Joseph is right and that rebasing on top of a > clean trunk branch is the way to go. > Do whatever you guys want and I will deal with it.
-Steve _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
