On 5/15/07, Kevin Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/15/07, Joakim Tjernlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 21:03 -0600, Kevin Day wrote: > > First off, good job with this version, for the most part it is > > noticably working better than the previous versions. > > > > I just ran into a problem with either posix threads (stable) > > (LINUXTHREADS_OLD=y) or something weird going on with the dynamic > > linker. > > The dynamic linker hasn't received much updates lately, I suspect > toolchain. Maybe a if you compile uClibc with SUPPORT_LD_DEBUG=y > and run your test app with > LD_DEBUG=all ./a.out > can tell us more. >
okay, with all debug optiosn except LD_DEBUG_EARLY, things compiled as they did before. Now that I have a debuggability, I performed two tests. I used perl for my tests as it also produces the same errors and..well just about all things using pthread. first was 'gcc -lperl -lpthread test.c' i then logged 'LD_DEBUG=all ./a.out' the second was 'gcc -lperl test.c' i then logged 'LD_DEBUG=all ./a.out' To see what is going on differently between the two, I made a diff of the two logs. I called it log.patch so vim would use syntax highlighting (.patch extension). The diff of the two tests is attached. -- Kevin Day
log.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
