Paul, all,
On Thursday 17 May 2007 21:48, Paul Brook wrote:
> > Unfortunately, Rules.mak does the following (only arm shown):
> > CPU_LDFLAGS-$(ARCH_LITTLE_ENDIAN)+=-EL
> >...
> > Shouldn't we add each of those {gcc,as,ld} options using call_{gcc,as,ld) ?
> No. We shouldn't be invoking the compiler in the first place.
> We should either use the right compiler (with all the right options), or
> don't
> use a compiler at all.
What do you think of the attached patch?
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ^ |
| --==< °_° >==-- °------------.-------: X AGAINST | /e\ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | (*_*) | / \ HTML MAIL | """ conspiracy. |
°------------------------------°-------°------------------°--------------------°
Index: uClibc/Makefile.in
===================================================================
--- uClibc/Makefile.in (revision 18643)
+++ uClibc/Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
cd $(top_builddir); \
tmp=`mktemp include/bits/sysnum.h.XXXXXX 2>/dev/null`; \
[ -z "$$tmp" ] && tmp='include/bits/sysnum.h.new'; \
- KERNEL_HEADERS="${KERNEL_HEADERS}" top_builddir=. CC="$(CC) $(CPU_CFLAGS)" $(SHELL) extra/scripts/gen_bits_syscall_h.sh > $$tmp; \
+ KERNEL_HEADERS="${KERNEL_HEADERS}" top_builddir=. CC=$(HOSTCC) $(SHELL) extra/scripts/gen_bits_syscall_h.sh > $$tmp; \
if cmp include/bits/sysnum.h $$tmp >/dev/null 2>&1; then \
$(RM) $$tmp; \
else \
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
