On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:33 +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > Is anyone working on a libgloss backend for uClibc?
We have one functional and running. We don't keep it up to date with the main branch right now because. 99% of the changes since I did the original work all deal with things that are very linux specific or against features we don't want to support (such as dynamic loading, or locales), so it is against, if I recall correctly, 0.9.27. At some point, I'll probably update it to work against the current version of uclibc, but there isn't much point right now as the things that have changed don't impact the functionality present in this edition. Search for message from me in the past about the issues of getting this sort of thing included in the main line, and getting it working with another target. In order to do it really correctly, much of the uclibc build structure would need to change, among other issues. FWIW, uclibc to the bare metal is much smaller than newlib to the bare metal (particularly in ROM footprint), although I've misplaced my exact stats. Sterling _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
