On 04/06/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 3:35 am, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > > Rob Landley wrote: > > > On Friday 01 June 2007 6:07 am, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > >> Why do you need to link it statically if the problem seems to be in > ld.so? > > > > > > Because if gdbserver is not linked statically, it needs ld.so to run, and > > > ld.so is segfaulting? > > > > > > This is just a guess. > > > > > > Rob > > Yes, you're right; in this case I could suggest this alternative way, > > using a mixed glibc/uClibc target. > > So you're saying they should attempt to cross-compile glibc for mips to debug > this problem, when uClibc is already there and works when statically linked? > > Why ? I started from the assumption (probably wrong for the mipsel, I don't know) of having a cross-compiled glibc system up&running. If this is the case, so my proposal could be useful (it was for me). While, if there isn't a working glibc system... well... discard my suggestion.
Regards, Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
