Rob Landley wrote: > On Sunday 22 July 2007 8:21:40 pm Denis Vlasenko wrote: >> Hi busybox, uclibc >> >> <rant> >> Just read this. >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32849 >> >> OMG. WE DO NOT DO ANY SSE!!! *ANY*! But we are going >> to have code in our binaries which tries to ensure >> that our non-existent SSE code will run ok. >> >> Shit. >> </rant> > > I've noticed that gcc is going further and further into the weeds. I miss > egcs, back when the FSF had nothing to do with the project... >
Have you read comment #8 in the bug report where Paul Brook tells you how to get exactly the behavior you desire as well as the reason that things are the way they are? I know it's fun to attack the FSF, but they really have nothing to do with deciding which the stack alignment will be used for a particular ABI. David Daney _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
