On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> attached patch for the ld.so checks that during symbol lookup > >> process, the DSO has an hash table, otherwise we need to skip > >> over the next into the list. > > > > idle curiosity, how did you generate a DSO w/out a hash table ? or is > > this a "it's got a GNU hash table but not a SYSV hash table" ? > > I didn't actually... could be considered in preparation of supporting > GNU hash style. > > Anyway, looking at the _dl_add_elf_hash_table, there is a null check for > the dynamic_info[DT_HASH], > that, should be alway not null, being initialized by > "_dl_parse_dynamic_info", so for coherence I added that check > > Discard this patch if you think currently not pointless.
i'm not saying the patch is pointless, just curious as to why you were proposing it in the first place -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
