Vladimir wrote: > Hi, > just for your information. > I`ve tested this gnu hash support on ARM - it works fine. > Good, thanks for your feedback... if you have also some figures on performance increase (as expected), I'll appreciate it. I'm going to post my results.
Regards, Carmelo > 2007/10/4, Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> as previously announced, the GNU hash support has been completed >>> and fully tested (at least on sh4 nptl port). >>> I successfully run all uClibc testsuite and LTP built with GNU hash only, >>> and all tests passed. >>> Further I've done tests with mixed shared objects (GNU ans SysV hash >>> style), >>> being able to relocate both of them, this guarantees the ld.so to be >>> backward >>> compatible, without forcing to rebuild all shared libraries (even if >>> they lack of >>> the benefits of the GNU hash) >>> >>> I'm glad to share this work with the uClibc community hoping to see >>> more development activities in the future. >>> >>> This patch applies on latest svn trunk (r20164). I removed from this >>> all TLS >>> changes :-(. >>> Actually I've not yet tested this on trunk, only on the nptl port. >>> >> Hi, >> I've tested the svn trunk with GNU hash support enabled for SH4. >> I was able to boot a board and use it running. I also executed some >> testcases >> from the testsuite... and I did not have problems with the linker during >> the symbol lookup. >> >> Just for your information >> >> Regards, >> Carmelo >> _______________________________________________ >> uClibc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc >> >> > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
