Okay, I guess it would work either way. The developers could download the patch from the bug tracking system, or from the following link, (hope this works).
http://www.nabble.com/file/p13138155/uclibc-backtrace.tar.gz uclibc-backtrace.tar.gz Let me know if the developers needs any of my assistance... - Eivind Carmelo AMOROSO-2 wrote: > > Eivind wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> I saw the bug posting at http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=101&nbn=1, >> and >> responded to it. That is, provided a patch to get backtrace working in >> uclibc for both X86 and for Arm (Xscale). How does patches normally get >> submitted to uclibc? should I too post the patch on this mailing list? >> > Yes, this is the flow... so developers colud have a look at this, > discuss, and at the end > you should see it merged ;-) > > Carmelo > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/backtrace%28%29-in-uclibc-tf4598520.html#a13138155 Sent from the uClibc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
