On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 13:02 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund a écrit : > > And why not pass NULL as it was before? > > The man 2 ppoll say: > > "If timeout is specified as NULL, then ppoll() can block indefinitely." > > So you are right, it's possible to passe a null pointer to do the same > as negative value. > > A new patch is in attachement.
Committed, thanks Jocke _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
