Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:55:35PM +0000, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> On Wednesday 07 November 2007 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> +config LDSO_GNU_HASH_SUPPORT >>> + bool "Enable GNU hash style support" >>> + depends on HAVE_SHARED >>> + default n >>> + help >>> + Newest binutils support a new hash style named GNU-hash. The dynamic >>> + linker will use the new GNU-hash section (.gnu.hash) for symbol >>> lookup >>> + if present into the ELF binaries, otherwise it will use the old SysV >>> + hash style (.hash). This ensures that it is completely backward >>> compatible. >>> + Further, being the hash table implementation self-contained into each >>> + executable and shared libraries, objects with mixed hash style can >>> + peacefully coexist in the same process. >>> + >>> + If you want to use this new feature, answer Y >>> + >>> >> If I would read this help text, I'd wonder whether this >> new GNU style hash is actually better than old way, and why. >> Is it smaller? faster? or what... >> > > One very visible effect introduced by it is that cross-compilation is > broken now. Unpleasant. > I've cross-compiled it before committing.... may you post your error log? Carmelo > Reverting locally. > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > >
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
