Hi, Steven J. Hill wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello. > > I have very much desired to get back to working on NPTL and merging everything > into the trunk from my branch. This evening the first of those went in. This is great. Support for good/fast thread support is something missing in uclibc.
What will be the relation between uclibc NPTL version and glibc one ? Will they be quite similar and update could be easy merged or it is more like a fork of NPTL do to a uclibc port. Is there a plan to keep the NPTL port in sync with the glibc one (and stuff like priority inheritance, robust futex, ...) ? Thanks Matthieu _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
