Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I don't remember exactly why we decided to pick the caller's value of
> sa_restorer when SA_ONSTACK is set, but it seems to break LTP's
> sigaltstack testcase. Some users have reported problems with
> sigaltstack as well; hopefully this will fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> libc/sysdeps/linux/avr32/sigaction.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libc/sysdeps/linux/avr32/sigaction.c
> b/libc/sysdeps/linux/avr32/sigaction.c
> index a97ff3d..6dcca91 100644
> --- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/avr32/sigaction.c
> +++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/avr32/sigaction.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int __libc_sigaction(int signum, const struct sigaction
> *act,
> kact.k_sa_handler = act->sa_handler;
> memcpy(&kact.sa_mask, &act->sa_mask, sizeof (kact.sa_mask));
> kact.sa_flags = act->sa_flags;
> - if (kact.sa_flags & (SA_RESTORER | SA_ONSTACK))
> + if (kact.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> kact.sa_restorer = act->sa_restorer;
> else
> kact.sa_restorer = __default_rt_sa_restorer;
>
Hello,
patch did not apply cleanly, anyway committed your changes by hands.
Cheers,
Carmelo
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
