On Monday 31 December 2007 02:05:01 Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > On Sunday 30 December 2007 14:02:22 Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > >> Sorry for the misunderstanding, I meant the nptl port for sh4 in ST > >> (actually included into svn nptl branch). No a new branch at all. > >> The merge status is that sh4 nptl code has been merged into the branch. > >> Steve is testing it on mips too. > >> The sh4 port (from the branch), excluding some work in progress at ST, > >> is exacly the same code ST's customers are using on their production > >> environment/boards. So hopefully, thanks to their real feedback, we > >> could produce fixe, solve bugs and make improvements in the future. > > > > Is Paul Brook's arm stuff merged into that branch too? > > > > Rob > > Not yet, IIRC Steve will start merging arm cod after completing mips > testing.
Is there any possible reason to play with the main branch anymore? Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc