On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:47:50 +0100 Hans-Christian Egtvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK we will keep this value, as it is chosen by a third party compiler > vendor (IAR). This was done before my time, so perhaps Haavard can shed > some light on it? You're right that it was initially used by the IAR toolchain, but we should probably try to get an official value. I'll ask if IAR has any plans. How do we get an official number these days? There's a comment in there saying we should ask SCO, but are they in shape to do anything right now? Haavard _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
