Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 19:17 +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> Bernhard Fischer wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:42:21PM +0000, Nigel Kukard wrote: >>> >>>> Should I debug this further or just work with the old implementation? >>> Well, it would be generally nice if the new linuxthreads would work on >>> x86 if you find the time, since i don't quite see much progress in the >>> NPTL camp. >>> >> I'm lucky having nptl on my sh4 ;-) >> I don't know if there is somebody interested in having nptl on others >> archs than arm/sh4/mips. > > So why don't you merge your NPTL back into trunk? > Hi Jocke, well currently nptl branch is aligned with sh4 development after my latest commit a few month ago (I mean the branch is what ST release to its customers) I know that Steve is working on merging ARM on the branch. So, to speed-up the work, I've started two weeks ago to synch branch with trunk to keep almost the only differences related to the nptl/tls stuff. Also. some of my latest commit on trunk have been done on branch as well. Moreover, I have other sets of patch almost ready to be committed on branch. So I think that at this point the best is keeping on this strategy. I hope that Steve will have ARM code ready soon.
I can ensure that it's my interest putting nptl on trunk asap. Cheers, Carmelo >> Volunteers are obviously welcome ! >> >> Carmelo > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
