On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 06:05:18PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > > Anyway, being this a big change, I'd like to hear other opinions > > and comment. > > Mike, Jocke, Bernds, Peter others... what do you think ? > > I agree that the current method is borderline insane. > > Since we import libc-symbols.h from glibc - what do they do, and do we > have good a reason to be different?
There's a second header in include/ that uses #include_next. An advantage of using a single header like vda suggested is that you could use PCH for it... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
