Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Bernhard Fischer >> Sent: den 21 april 2008 14:21 >> To: Timo Teräs >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386 >> >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:33:59PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> splice et al for i386. Against svn trunk. >> Ah, yes. We should also see if using some of the new syscalls help >> busybox. >> >> I'll apply this patch in a few days unless i hear something >> controversial. >> >> thanks and cheers, >> Bernhard > > Any particular reason to uncomment sync_file_range() in fcntl.h? > It does not seem to be part of the patch.
My bad. I was also doing the same patch for 0.9.28.3 and got confused with the headers a bit. > Also, you might as well take the latest fcntl.h from glibc while at > it to get a couple of missing defines (unrelated to splice). I just took the new protos for related calls. But might be good to take the whole header. I'll make a new patch today. - Timo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
