> -----Original Message----- > From: Bernhard Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 20 maj 2008 22:20 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Stubbing out unavailable syscalls? > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:07:26PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > >Still think ease of cross compiling is more important than stubs. > > I don't see how this is in any way related to cross compilation since > sysnum.h is created just fine either way. Please elaborate?
configure often tests for presence of a function by compiling a test program which will fail when that function is undefined. > > >Are there any apps that is broken due to missing stubs? > > Anything that checks if a syscall "works" is potentially affected. Yes obviously, I wanted a list of such apps(if there are any) > > >I can live with stubs behind a config option, default off. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
