Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:49:53PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
>> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> Could somebody who uses ldso please have a look if this breaks his
>>> setup?
>>>
>>> $ size ldso/ldso/ldso.oS*
>>> text data bss dec hex filename
>>> 12424 12 72 12508 30dc ldso/ldso/ldso.oS.old
>>> 12290 12 72 12374 3056 ldso/ldso/ldso.oS
>>>
>>> @@ -59,7 +59,11 @@
>>> dynamic linking at all, so we cannot return any error codes.
>>> We just punt if there is an error. */
>>> #define __NR__dl_exit __NR_exit
>>> -static __always_inline _syscall1(void, _dl_exit, int, status);
>>> +static __always_inline attribute_noreturn void _dl_exit(int status)
>>> +{
>>> + while (1)
>>> + INLINE_SYSCALL(exit, 1, status);
>>> +}
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Bernd,
>> I've just now the chance to update my repo and figured out that this
>> brakes sh4 build.
>> My you explain the rationale for this change ?
>>
>
> http://busybox.net/lists/uclibc/2008-May/019394.html
>
> I'm not opposed to reverting that hunk but that explicit variant was
> better, imho.
>
>
Hi,
the problem is that it needs to update sh4/bits/syscall.h because it
doesn't define INLINE_SYSCALL macro.
I'll see to update this... so let's keep this.
At this point I support all other _syscall macro will be removed as well
to use the explicit variant ?
Carmelo
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
