On Sunday 08 June 2008 15:35, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > - reverting it adds back 70k BSS to libcrypt, but I expect not too many > programs link with it, and those that do are likely to need the data > anyway.
Actually, there is one program which you use a lot too. It's busybox. busybox, if compiled with sulogin, passwd and/or login applet, will require additional 70k of RAM for EVERY applet started (crond, inetd, httpd, klogd, syslogd, udhcpd, init, to name a few long-running ones) on NOMMU machine. klogd and syslogd are even run on blackfin board in standard image I have here. > To summarize, as it exists now the code is less robust than it used to > be (especially on nommu systems). Are there any objections if I apply > the patch below (which reverts revision 19342)? I want to ask you to respond to my reply when you were asking that question before. -- vda _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
