Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> I have no comment on the patch itself, but I like the approach - I've >> concluded before that this is the only sane way to test toolchain >> pieces, especially compiler or C library. We do all of our testing >> after installation here. > > My patch doesn't really create a full installation tree that looks > identical to the one created by 'make install'; that might require > somewhat more effort (unless we want to just $(MAKE) install > DESTDIR=somewhere/in/tree for every make test). > > > Bernd Hi Bernd, I like it too... and I prefer your easier approach instead of having a full installation of headers. Indeed what we need now is to able to build the test-suite from the working tree.
Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
