On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:26:11AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Hi Paul, > are you ok with changing default behaviour on sh4 regarding RLIMIT > wrapper. The change in the attached patch was required to fix > LTP/setrlimit02 test case. > Looks fine to me. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
- [PATCH] sh4 supports new {s,g]rlimit syscall Carmelo AMOROSO
- Re: [PATCH] sh4 supports new {s,g]rlimit syscall Paul Mundt
- Re: [PATCH] sh4 supports new {s,g]rlimit syscall Carmelo AMOROSO
