On Wednesday 09 July 2008 18:59, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Hi Steve, Khem, Mike, all ... > well just an update on the NPTL branch synch&merge work. > > I've discussed privately with Khem that is working on re-basing ARM nptl > port and agreed to commit all the merged stuff I had on my nptl working > copy. > In the recent weeks I've merged/integrated and tested a lot of work from > trunk making a almost synchronized nptl branch (at least of sh4 port). > > At this point the current status of the NPTL branch is that it is > working fine for sh4 and should still build and work for mips. > > So I kindly ask Steve to test again on his mips hw (apologies idvance > for any breakage I could have done). > > Khem now is working to rebase his ARM patches on top of the freashen > branch and than commit his stuff. > > If no issues from mips side (hopefully) we can say to have again a > stable nptl branch for al three supported archs. > > There are other few files not completely merged with trunk that need > more investigation (misc/internals and some other headers), but > excluding these all the differences between nptl and trunk should be > related to NPTL and TLS part. > > I'll take care of merging future incoming changes on trunk back to nptl > branch. > > After that, hopefully in the next weeks (next two weeks I'll be not > available), we will be ready to move all to trunk.
Seeing you doing all this, I really hesitate to do libc_hidden_proto removal before you merge nptl branch to trunk - it (removal) will touch almost every .c and .h file! So I will wait ~three weeks for the merge to complete. BTW, will there be a new uclibc release just before the merge? ;) ;) ;) -- vda _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
