Takashi Yoshii wrote: > Hi, > >> Hum... I think that we are lucky because _dl_fini is defined in ldso.c >> that includes dl-startup.c that includes dl-startup.h... but if >> _dl_fini were defined in another compilation units ? does it work ? am >> I correct ? > Well, that strange structure of the source code tells us that this > program is > more or less under such a restriction, I think. > But, yes, this one could result some difficulty on future re-construction. > >> My solution is based on a more generic solution using a GOT entry. >> What is the best solution ? comments ? > May I? May I say, My code is better because it is 12 bytes smaller! > as a joke. Thank you. > Your GOT approach is more generic, and seems to be common seeing other > ARCHs does the same(except m68k and mips?). Please feel free to ignore > my code. I'm happy to see the issue fixed by the combined code. > > Cheers. > /yoshii >
Ok, I'll commit it. Good collaborative work ;-) Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
