On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:17 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:26:25PM -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> > > >I haven't tested without LFS support, but no patching would be necessary > >in that case since the offset would only be 4 bytes. > > Can you please verify this with LFS turned off nevertheless? > TIA, I verified that my minimal tests also work without LFS support. Wade _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
