On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:

>> Yes, I use it and it works.
>
>Any idea what is wrong with the !old version, in that it seems not to be 
>recommended for use?

IIRC the old is the fallback if you encounter problems in the !old.
Since the !old is, by now, supposedly not too current either, somebody
could look into updating the !old, i guess (but then, i'm not
interrested in any of them).
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to