Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: >> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 05:41:14 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge? >>>> >>>> What is the status of the 0.9.30 release? >>> vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM. >>> >>> What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch? i386 >>> seems to be in a good shape, AFAICS. Perhaps it would be nice to look >>> at the open issues in mantis and fix a couple of them for .30-rc1. >>> Just a thought.. >> >> I'm interested in finding regressions too, because I'm seriously >> considering putting out a .30 of my own just so there's a known set of >> bugs to test against. (Considering that nothing's been checked into >> the repository for two weeks, this seems like a nice point to do it...) >> > I agree, I don't see any real issues for postponing to ship a .30 release > just now. > I stopped for a while nptl merge because involved in kernel stuff, > but I'll go back to uclibc next week. > As you have seen, I've fixed a problem in ntpl static link. > I've discovered similar problrms on trunk (using linuxthreads.old) at least > on sh4 (but I think it's a common problem). > I'll come with a test case soon, but being this issue affecting static > binaries, > I don't think it can delay .30 release. >
Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth including in .30 release. - locale supports fixes - an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation (currently used since a long time in uclibc-nptl, glibc and kernel) - getdents > I don't know Mike's plan, but he is silent since a long time. > >> I was working on this last week, but upgrading my laptop to Kubuntu >> 8.04 knocked me offline for a week. Back now. :) >> >> Right now, I'm upgrading my Firmware Linux targets from 0.9.29 to >> svn. I'll let you know what breaks, and hopefully patch it up for a >> quick .30. I should be able to test x86, x86-64, mips (both >> endiannesses), arm little endian, and powerpc. (And maybe sparc if it >> suddenly decides to work, but it didn't under 0.9.29.) >> > I'll try to test sh4 on trunk too. > >> Rob >> _____ > Carmelo > _______________ >> uClibc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc >> > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
