On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:27:52AM +0200, Joachim Nilsson wrote: > >> >During that campaign I upgraded to 0.9.29 only to discover that I had > >> >been bitten by issue #2834. So I decided to start testing the daily > >> What arch and what threads impl did you choose to build with which > >> compiler version? > >Arm/Xscale with both linuxthreads and linuxthreads.old. I haven't yet > >had a chance to test the latest from SVN (due to my having chased these > So which version of gcc and binutils do you use, endian, abi etc, etc.
Sorry for crying wolf like that. It must have been my home brewed cross compiler (big-endian, oabi, gcc v4.2.4, binutils 2.18, from buildroot) that messed up somehow. When I reverted back to our current armbe-based GCC v4.1.2 with uClibc 0.9.29 (linuxthreads-old) my threaded apps work just fine. I'm currently testing out a crosstool-ng based v4.2.4 with uClibc 0.9.29 and it too seems to work just fine. Sorry for the line noise and thanks for a great C library! Regards /Jocke _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
