>>> > supply a cross compiler for the host system? >> It's pretty trivial...
Pity that noone ships a tarball of x86 toolchain which could be just untarred to the rootfs and has out-of-box means to build, say, buildroot for x86. Cross compiling is indeed very important task but native tools are of not less importance, imo. Still AFAICS buildroot doesn't accept external toolchains cleanly: it is supposed that one should build uClibc/gcc/binutils from scratch, but I want to use, say, precompiled Rob's tool and libes. Still uclibc/busybox based tools do not fit buildroot (which is claimed to support them, right?). Still bison and flex (and evil gettext) binaries are must-pre-have on the host system. Still an unavoidable assumption of host system has the support for shared libes sustains. My, I don't know whether to spend man-hours to patch buildroot for my needs or get back to my old building system. I'd strongly prefer the former but am not so fluent in the guts of buildroot... :( -- Vladimir _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
