On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a bit puzzled about ldd, i admit: > > $ ldd /bin/ls > /bin/ls: is setuid > FOO etc root tmp > FOO2 home s usr > bin ldd sbin var > boot lib stress-dlopen.c > config linuxrc stress-uc > dev proc sys > $ ldd /bin/rm > /bin/rm: is setuid > BusyBox v1.13.0.svn (2008-10-29 19:25:31 CET) multi-call binary > > Usage: rm [OPTION]... FILE... > > Remove (unlink) the FILE(s). Use '--' to > indicate that all following arguments are non-options. > > Options: > -i Always prompt before removing > -f Never prompt > -r,-R Remove directories recursively > > checking sub-depends for '/lib/libcrypt.so.0' > checking sub-depends for '/lib/libc.so.0' > libcrypt.so.0 => /lib/libcrypt.so.0 (0x00000000) > libc.so.0 => /lib/libc.so.0 (0x00000000) > /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 => /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 (0x00000000) > $ > > Not sure if running the binary is such a good idea. Thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc >
this is/was working fine on uclibc-0.9.29. it this what we should expect if we move to uclibc-0.9.30-rc* ? I'll double check the option mentioned by Rob on my future builds. -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu with Git inside ! _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
