Hi, Rob
Rob Landley wrote:
Research team? Or automated tool? Because a human might have noticed that:
Team that use automated tool, half-automatically.
Project: uClibc
Repository: svn://uclibc.org/trunk/uClibc/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
File: uClibc/test/string/tester.c:
1319: equal(one, "axxxefgh", 2); /* Basic test. */
1320:
1321: (void) memset(one+2, 'y', 0);
1322: equal(one, "axxxefgh", 3); /* Zero-length set. */
Reason: Zero length as a 3rd argument has no sense for memset function. It
may happen order of 2nd and 3rd parameters are wrong.
It's in the uClibc test suite, and the comment explicitly says we're testing a
zero length set. So I'd guess we know we're doing this, we're making sure the
library behaves when explicitly asked to do something stupid.
You are right, sorry.
So, as I understand we check that memset doesn't threat 0-byte size as
1-byte size. Hm..
But as for me for test suite better memset(NULL, 'y', 0), but anyway you
are right, I shouldn't report about this code.
This letter is not spam.
That phrase does not help messages stay _out_ of spam filters.
This phrase intended to me for humans
I will remove it from my template.
Rob
Thank you,
Dmtyro Gorbunov
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
