On Saturday 22 November 2008 11:36:42 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Do we need to maintain sizeof(sigset_t) equal to glibc's?
Don't see why, we're already not binary compatible with glibc (or with our own previous versions until 1.00), and this value comes out of a header we supply... While we're at it, is there any reason for dev_t to equal glibc's size instead of linux's? (Linus expanded dev_t to 32 bits rather than 64, because he wanted it to be a cookie and wanted to _discourage_ people from doing things like encoding scsi luns in there. But alas, glibc is partly written for hurd, which has much insanity.) Rob _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
