On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 08:43:09PM -0800, Michael Deutschmann wrote: > On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, I wrote: > > So it looks like this case needs to be refined, not to reject uClibc, but > > to make sure the platform is indeed ELF, which is no longer implied by > > "__GLIBC__". > > I looked a little more closely and it seems things are a bit wierd. The > code in question is already wrapped within an "#if > defined(OBJECT_FORMAT_ELF)" block.
Are you sure that is the relevant check? ELF object files are used on arm-uclinux and m68k-uclinux; they're just translated into bFLT for executables. But it's the lack of ELF at runtime that causes a problem. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
