On Saturday 10 January 2009 02:45, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi Denys
>
> Shouldn't this check be like the one in the patch
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
* Try to catch this problem at uclibc build time: */
struct BUG_sigset_size {
int BUG_sigset_size
- [sizeof(act->sa_mask) != _NSIG / 8 ? 1 : -1];
+ [sizeof(act->sa_mask) == (_NSIG - 1) / 8 ? 1 : -1];
};
return __syscall_rt_sigaction(sig, act, oact, sizeof(act->sa_mask));
}
Yes, It should be ==. (_NSIG - 1) is correct but not necessary,
since it is always 2^N + 1 and "+1" will be lost in / 8.
Thanks. Fixed in svn.
--
vda
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
